Self-efficacy Belief in Reading and Writing Scale读写自我效能量表

来自OBHRM百科
跳转至: 导航搜索

简介

自我效能是指个人相信他们具有通过自己的行动使事情发生的能力。读写自我效能是一个在学习上更一般的自我效能感,专注于这两个方面的自我效能应该给我们一个更清晰的了解:他们的阅读和写作能力信念,如何与他们的学习方法相关联,从而找出干预措施。

信度与效度

Prat-Sala,M.,&Redford P.(2010)对英国一所大学的163名大一学生进行了问卷调查,每名学生都参加两次调查,第一次是在第一学期的开始两周后,第二次在第二学期开始四个月后。

读写自我效能两表包括阅读学术文章自我效能分量表、论文写作分量表,两个分量表在第一次调查时内部一致性系数为0.898,0.897,第二次调查时内部一致性系数为0.918,0.881。

量表

请您根据自己的实际感受和体会,用下面24项描述对您读书和写作的情况进行评价和判断,并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下: 1 极差 2 差 3 较差 4 不太确定 5较好 6 好 7 很好

1.How well can you identify all the key points when reading a journal article or academic book?
2.How well can you understand a journal article or academic book if you put a lot of effort in?
3.Whilst reading an article, how well can you identify other relevant references which you consider may be of further interest to read?
4.After you have read a text, how well can you answer questions on it?
5.How well can you understand the meaning of each sentence when you read?
6.How well can you recall the most important points (e.g., development of an argument) when you have finished reading a journal article or book chapter?
7.Before you critically evaluate a statement, how well have you understood its meaning?
8.How well can you search effectively for relevant background reading when writing an essay?
9.When reading, how well can you make notes in your own words?
10.If you cannot understand an academic text, how well can you understand it if you go to a lecture about it?
11.How well can you use a variety of different methods to enable your understanding of a book chapter or journal article? (e.g., highlighting, underlining, etc.).
12.How well can you select the most appropriate reading from a number of relevant articles and books?
13.How well can you express your arguments clearly in essays?
14.How well can you link the paragraphs to make your essay coherent and make the text flow?
15.If you put in a lot of effort, how well can you write an essay you are proud of?
16.How well can you provide relevant evidence to support your argument?
17.Before you finish your essay, how well can you make the conclusion relate to the introduction and the essay question?
18.How well can you write an effective introduction which informs the reader of your intentions for the essay?
19.How well can you demonstrate substantial subject knowledge in your essay?
20.How well can you think about what is required of you before you write an essay?
21.How wellcanyouput ideas together in suchawaythat they are clear to the reader?
22.How well can you critically evaluate ideas and arguments in an essay using evidence, but without using personal opinions?
23.How well can you plan and write essays because you know what the tutor expects of you?
24.How well can you adopt a variety of different methods to enhance your essay writing, according to the question? (e.g., noting everything down straight away or writing the essay in separate blocks and then putting it together, etc.).

计分方法

读写自我效能量表共24道题,包括阅读学术文章自我效能分量表、论文写作分量表,
阅读学术文章自我效能分量表共12道题,具体包括第1-12题;
论文写作量表共12道题,具体包括第13-24题;
可以计算平均分或总分。

量表出处

Prat-Sala, M., &Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 283–305.

参考文献

Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners (pp.262–271). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approach to study inventory across contrasting groups and context. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.

友情提醒

为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, 请根据量表出处规范引用,谢谢!