“Attention to Others’ emotions Scale 关注他人情绪量表”的版本间的差异

来自OBHRM百科
跳转至： 导航、 搜索
（创建页面，内容为“== 简介 == Attention to others’ emotions is one of preconditions for learning in experiential learning theory. Attention to others’ emotions is a holistic appr...”）
 
 
（未显示3个用户的6个中间版本）
第1行： 第1行：
 
== 简介 ==
 
== 简介 ==
−
Attention to others’ emotions is one of preconditions for learning in experiential learning theory. Attention to others’ emotions is a holistic approach (D. A. Kolb, 1984) that includes emotions as well as action and cognition. Emotion can play at least two key roles in experiential learning. First, emotions like fear, frustration, anger, excitement, eagerness, or embarrassment can be an important impetus for learning and can frame and focus a learning event (see Kolb & Kolb, 2005). Second, the emotions of participants in a learning encounter (e.g., a teacher, other learners) communicate critical information, both by generating cues that others can interpret for their own meaning and by suggesting how others should interpret and sort through what is being said (Burgoon, 1994; Keltner & Haidt, 1999).
+
关注他人情绪（Attention to others’ emotions）是学习经验学习理论的一个前提条件。关注他人情绪是一个整合的研究，他包括情绪、行为以及认知 (D. A. Kolb, 1984)。情绪在经验学习中至少有两个重要作用，第一，像害怕、沮丧、生气、激动、愤怒或者困窘这些情绪，是学习的重要动力，并且能够形成和集中为一个学习事件( Kolb & Kolb, 2005)。第二，在学习经历中，参与者（如老师或其他学习者）的情绪会通过其他人翻译他们自己的意思产生线索、或通过建议他人应该怎样翻译和分类所说的内容，来交流重要信息(Burgoon, 1994; Keltner & Haidt, 1999)。
−
 
 
−
Quinn et al. (2016) measured attention to the emotions of others using three items from Bartel and Saavedra’s (2000) emotional contagion scale that focus specifically on a participants’ self- perceived tendencies to pay attention to and understand others’ emotions.
 
−
 
 
−
Quinn et al. (2016) tested their hypotheses using data obtained from participants in huddles that took place in newspaper newsrooms. Ultimately, we received at least one completed survey from 106 newsrooms (52% of those who agreed to participate and 21% of eligible newsrooms). This response rate (21%) is similar to the participation rates in individual experience sampling studies (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi & LeFevre, 1989). After dropping surveys from newspapers that sent only one completed survey, we had 178 surveys from 73 newspapers (14% of total newsrooms).
 
  
 
== 信度与效度 ==
 
== 信度与效度 ==
−
Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91 for the items in our newsroom sample.
+
第一个样本的内部一致性系数是：0.91。验证性因素分析结果表明，一因素模型与数据最匹配 (CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.11)。
−
Using the data from 97 working professionals (after deleting 14 unusable cases) who used an online survey solicitation website (Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk; see Buhrmester, Kwang, & Gosling, 2011, for evidence that this procedure can yield high- quality data), the confirmatory factor analyses show that one-factor models achieved adequate fit statistics (CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.11)
 
  
 
== 量表 ==
 
== 量表 ==
第22行： 第17行：
  
 
== 计分方法 ==
 
== 计分方法 ==
−
The first two items focus on the tendency to pay attention to others’ emotions, and the third item focuses on the participants’ belief in their ability to understand others’ emotions.
+
前两题测量参与者关注他人情绪的倾向，第三题测量参与者对自己理解他人情绪能力的信念
  
 
关注他人情绪量表共3道题目，可计算平均分或总分。
 
关注他人情绪量表共3道题目，可计算平均分或总分。
第31行： 第26行：
 
== 参考文献 ==
 
== 参考文献 ==
 
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2010). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(45), 197-231.
 
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2010). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(45), 197-231.
 +
 +
== 友情提醒 ==
 +
为方便学术研究，根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成，供学者在学术研究中使用， <b><font color="red">商业使用请与原作者联系</font></b>。为了尊重作者的劳动成果， <b><font color="blue">请根据量表出处规范引用</font></b>，谢谢！
  
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]

2016年12月24日 (六) 12:10的最新版本

简介

关注他人情绪（Attention to others’ emotions）是学习经验学习理论的一个前提条件。关注他人情绪是一个整合的研究，他包括情绪、行为以及认知 (D. A. Kolb, 1984)。情绪在经验学习中至少有两个重要作用，第一，像害怕、沮丧、生气、激动、愤怒或者困窘这些情绪，是学习的重要动力，并且能够形成和集中为一个学习事件( Kolb & Kolb, 2005)。第二，在学习经历中，参与者（如老师或其他学习者）的情绪会通过其他人翻译他们自己的意思产生线索、或通过建议他人应该怎样翻译和分类所说的内容，来交流重要信息(Burgoon, 1994; Keltner & Haidt, 1999)。

信度与效度

第一个样本的内部一致性系数是：0.91。验证性因素分析结果表明，一因素模型与数据最匹配 (CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.11)。

量表

请您根据自己的实际感受和体会，用下面3项描述对您自己与同事的相处情况行评价和判断，并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下： Quinn et al. (2016) measured the tendency to attend to others’ emotions using 9-point Likert scales ranging from 1 = “disagree completely” to 9 = “agree completely.”

1.I pay attention to what my co-workers are feeling.
2.I am very sensitive in picking up on my co-workers’ feelings.
3.I am very accurate in judging my co-workers’ feelings.


下载WORD版问卷：文件:Aoe.doc

计分方法

前两题测量参与者关注他人情绪的倾向，第三题测量参与者对自己理解他人情绪能力的信念

关注他人情绪量表共3道题目，可计算平均分或总分。

量表出处

Quinn, R. W. (2013). Could we huddle on this project? participant learning in newsroom conversations. Journal of Management, Vol 42(2), Feb 2016, 386-418.

参考文献

Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2010). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(45), 197-231.

友情提醒

为方便学术研究，根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成，供学者在学术研究中使用， 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果， 请根据量表出处规范引用，谢谢！

取自“http://www.obhrm.net/index.php?title=Attention_to_Others’_emotions_Scale_关注他人情绪量表&oldid=1634”