Transactive Memory Systems交互记忆系统量表

来自OBHRM百科
Fengcailing讨论 | 贡献2017年3月21日 (二) 19:47的版本 (创建页面,内容为“== 简介 == Wegner(1985)提出交互记忆(transactive memory, TM)概念,指的是对来自不同知识领域的信息进行编码、储存、检索和...”)

(差异) ←上一版本 | 最后版本 (差异) | 下一版本→ (差异)
跳转至: 导航搜索

简介

Wegner(1985)提出交互记忆(transactive memory, TM)概念,指的是对来自不同知识领域的信息进行编码、储存、检索和交流活动的共享的认知劳动分工,它通常是在亲密关系基础上发展起来的。在工作群体中,当个体了解到其他成员的专长时,获取和编码与专长相关信息的责任就会通过内隐或外显的方式分配给最合适的专家成员,此时交互记忆就产生了。Wegner将交互记忆系统定义为每个成员所拥有知识的总和(知识存量),以及关于谁知道什么的集体意识。 Lewis等(2003)为了评估交互记忆系统编制了交互记忆系统15个题项的量表,共3个维度,每个维度5个项目。

信度与效度

该量表显示,内部一致性信度(α= .86),评判间一致性(Rwg(j)= .97)和同行间信度(ICC 1 = .36,ICC2 = .64,F = 2.79,p <.001)。

量表


Specialization
1. Each team member has specialized knowledge of some aspect of our project.
2. I have knowledge about an aspect of the project that no other team member has.
3. Different team members are responsible for expertise in different areas.
4. The specialized knowledge of several different team members was needed to complete the project deliverables.
5. I know which team members have expertise in specific areas.
Credibility
1. I was comfortable accepting procedural suggestions from other team members.
2. I trusted that other members’ knowledge about the project was credible.
3. I was confident relying on the information that other team members brought to the discussion.
4. When other members gave information, I wanted to double-check it for myself. (reversed)
5. I did not have much faith in other members’ “expertise.” (reversed)
Coordination
1. Our team worked together in a well-coordinated fashion.
2. Our team had very few misunderstandings about what to do.
3. Our team needed to backtrack and start over a lot. (reversed)
4. We accomplished the task smoothly and efficiently.
5. There was much confusion about how we would accomplish the task. (reversed)

计分方法

所有条目均使用5点计分,不同意-同意答题形式,其中1-非常不同意,2-不同意,3-中立,4-同意,5-非常同意。

参考文献

Heavey.C ,Simsek.Z(2017). Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Influence of Transactive Memory Systems. 《Journal of Management》, 71(7):772-783

量表出处

Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 587-604.

友情提醒

   为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, 请根据量表出处规范引用,谢谢!