Propensity to Moral Disengagement Scale 个体道德推脱量表

简介

个体道德推脱是Bandura(1986)在其社会认知理论基础上提出的理论。Bandura(1986)将道德推脱分为8个维度。Celia Moore等(2012)通过5个研究对道德脱离量表进行了深入研究，结果表明，24-, 16- and 8-题目的道德推脱量表都有较好的信度和效度。

信度与效度

该量表的24-, 16- and 8-题目内部一致性系数均大于为0.8，且有较好的结构效度。

量表

请您根据自己的实际感受和体会判断您是否同意下面每个句子的描述，并在最符合的数字上划○。 Items measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” Items in bold comprise the final 8-item measure. Items marked with * comprise the 16-item measure.

Moral Justification:
It is okay to spread rumors to defend those you care about. *
It is alright to lie to keep your friends out of trouble. *
Playing dirty is sometimes necessary in order to achieve noble ends.
Euphemistic Labelling:
Taking something without the owner’s permission is okay as long as you’re just borrowing it. *
It’s okay to gloss over certain facts to make your point.*
When you’re negotiating for something you want, not telling the whole story is just part of the game.
Advantageous Comparison:
Considering the ways people grossly misrepresent themselves, it’s hardly a sin to inflate your own credentials a bit.*
Compared to other illegal things people do, taking something small from a store without paying for it isn’t worth worrying about. *
Damaging property is no big deal when you consider that others are assaulting people.
Displacement of Responsibility:
People shouldn’t be held accountable for doing questionable things when they were just doing what an authority figure told them to do.*
People cannot be blamed for misbehaving if their friends pressured them to do it.*
You can’t blame people for breaking the rules if that’s what they we taught to do by their leaders.
Diffusion of Responsibility
People can’t be blamed for doing things that are technically wrong when all their friends are doing it too. *
It’s okay to tell a lie if the group agrees that it’s the best way to handle the situation.?
In contexts where everyone cheats, there’s no reason not to.
Distortion of Consequences：
Taking personal credit for ideas that were not your own is no big deal.*
Walking away from a store with some extra change doesn’t cause any harm.*
It is OK to tell small lies when negotiating because no one gets hurt.
Dehumanization:
Some people have to be treated roughly because they lack feelings that can be hurt.*
It’s okay to treat badly somebody who behaves like scum. *
Violent criminals don’t deserve to be treated like normal human beings.
Attribution of Blame:
People who get mistreated have usually done something to bring it on themselves.*
If a business makes a billing mistake in your favor, it’s okay not to tell them about it because it was their fault.*
If people have their privacy violated, it’s probably because they have not taken adequate precautions to protect it.

下载WORD版问卷：文件:MDS.docX

计分方法

24-, 16- and 8-题目道德推脱量表可以计算所包括题目的平均分。

量表出处

Moore, Detert, Trevino, Baker, Mayer. (2012). WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1-48.

友情提醒

为方便学术研究，根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成，供学者在学术研究中使用， 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果， 请根据量表出处规范引用，谢谢！