“Virtual Collaboration Scale 虚拟合作量表”的版本间的差异

来自OBHRM百科
跳转至: 导航搜索
量表
 
第36行: 第36行:
 
==参考文献==
 
==参考文献==
 
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95.
 
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95.
 +
 +
== 友情提醒 ==
 +
为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, <b><font color="red">商业使用请与原作者联系</font></b>。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, <b><font color="blue">请根据量表出处规范引用</font></b>,谢谢!
  
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]

2016年12月24日 (六) 15:03的最新版本

简介

为了支持在全球化、外包和战略合作等领域的重大战略举措,组织越来越多地转向使用在地理上分散的团队,成员依靠网络技术在虚拟团队中进行合作。面对这样的挑战,许多学者指出虚拟团队领导者在促进虚拟合作中的潜在重要性,好的团队领导者有助于分散的团队达到高水平表现。

Hill, N. S. et al.(2015)研究了一家从事采购业务的大型跨国公司中的在地理上分散的团队。团队成员完成了两项不同的调查,由每一个团队成员完成的第一项调查被称为焦点小组成员调查,这项调查提供了成员关于虚拟团队情境判断的数据,并进行了个体控制变量的研究。然后每个团队成员2周后完成第二次调查,收集团队成员对团队部分领导授权的程度的评分。此外,每个团队成员评估三至五个其他成员的虚拟合作水平。

Hill, N. S. et al.(2015)开发了包含三个因素的量表测量了团队成员的虚拟协作水平,评估团队成员聚焦于所从事的行为的程度。

信度与效度

CFA using data from this study on the virtual collaboration measure showed acceptable fitt for a model with three first-order factors (the three virtual collaboration dimensions) and one second-order factor (χ2 = 287.20, df = 32, p < .001; non-normed fit index (NNFI) = .93, comparative fit index(CFI)=.95, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR)=.03). This model showed significantly better fit than a model in which all the behaviors were loaded on one factor (χ2 = 403.25, df = 36, p < .001; NNFI = .91, CFI = .93, SRMR = .04). These CFA results, along with the high correlations between the virtual collaboration dimensions (r between .87 and .90))。

量表

根据自己的实际感受和体会,对下面10项描述进行评价和判断,在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下:1 = does not describe the team member at all to 7 = describes the team member extremely well.
1.Uses technology effectively to communicate virtually with team members.
2.Communicates virtually with other team members in a way that is clear and easily understood.
3.Takes steps to avoid misunderstandings when communicating virtually with team members (e.g., by providing important background information, verifying receipt of messages, requesting and providing clarification).
4.Sends virtual communications with a positive, encouraging tone.
5.Keeps team members informed of progress and issues.
6.Provides detailed and useful input and feedback to other team members when requested.
7.Shows initiative in working with the team (assumes leadership for tasks and for helping the team resolve problems).
8.Works well with team members from diverse backgrounds.
9.Is open to differences in ideas and approaches to the task among members of the team.
10.Constructively resolves conflict with other team members.

下载WORD版问卷:文件:Vc.doc

计分方法

虚拟合作量表包括10道题,一共有3个部分:虚拟通用技术的有效应用、虚拟支持与回应的相互作用和虚拟跨边界合作,可计算每个分量表所包括题目的总分或平均分。每个分量表。每个分量表包括的题目如下:
虚拟通用技术的有效应用(Effective use of technology for virtual communication) 量表:共4道题,第1、2、3、4题。
虚拟支持与回应的相互作用(Supportive and responsive virtual interactions)量表:共3道题,第5、6、7题。
虚拟跨边界合作(Collaborating virtually across boundaries)量表:共3道题,第8、9、10题.


量表出处

Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2015). Transparency of assessment centers: lower criterion‐related validity but greater opportunity to perform? Personnel Psychology, 69, págs. 467-497.

参考文献

Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95.

友情提醒

为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, 请根据量表出处规范引用,谢谢!