“用Jamovi还原Deterrence Effects: The Role of Authoritarian Leadership in Controlling Employee Workplace Deviance一文统计分析”的版本间的差异
来自OBHRM百科
Wangjiayan(讨论 | 贡献) (→5、描述性统计) |
Wangjiayan(讨论 | 贡献) (→2、量表的信度) |
||
第41行: | 第41行: | ||
===2、量表的信度=== | ===2、量表的信度=== | ||
+ | 量表信度分析。详见:信度分析 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[文件:Jamovi_α_AL.png|600px ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[文件:Jamovi_α_BL.png|600px ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[文件:Jamovi_α_Depen.png|600px ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[文件:Jamovi_α_deviance.png|600px ]] | ||
===3、ICC=== | ===3、ICC=== |
2020年4月1日 (三) 15:15的版本
目录
文章信息与数据
Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Graham, L., Redman, T., & Hu, S. Deterrence Effects: The Role of Authoritarian Leadership in Controlling Employee Workplace Deviance. Management and Organization Review, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2019.50
该文包括研究1与研究2,两个研究的统计分析基本一致。下面以研究1为例,介绍如何利用jamovi还原统计分析
研究1里头报告的统计结果
1、样本基本情况
In the follower sample, 73.4% were male and 84.5% were married or living as married. The average age and tenure with supervisors were 40.2 and 4.4 years, respectively.
2、量表的信度
Authoritarian leadership: The Cronbach’s alpha in this sample was 0.86. Benevolent leadership: The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96. Resource dependence : The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95. Interpersonal deviance : The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96. Leader-member exchange (LMX) : The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93.
3、ICC
ICC values were high (> 0.10: Bliese, 2000) for interpersonal deviance (ICC1 = 0.57)
4、验证性因素分析
5、描述性统计
6、linear mixed model结果
研究1统计分析还原
1、样本基本情况
在jamovi里头打开数据,然后统计样本的性别(变量名:Gender_r)、婚姻状况(变量名:Marital)分布频次,具体方法:频次分析
计算样本的平均年龄(变量名:Age)与平均工作年限(TeSupT1),具体方法: 描述性统计
2、量表的信度
量表信度分析。详见:信度分析
3、ICC
4、验证性因素分析
四因子模型( (authoritarian leadership, benevolent leadership, resource dependence, interpersonal deviance) 的验证性因子分析。具体方法:验证性因子分析
5、描述性统计
变量间相关性分析。具体方法:相关性分析