“Perceived Job Relevance Scale 工作相关感知量表”的版本间的差异

来自OBHRM百科
跳转至： 导航、 搜索
（创建页面，内容为“== 简介 == The framework for learning in huddles is grounded in an experiential learning framework. Based on the assumptions of experiential learning theories, Qui...”）
 
 
（未显示同一用户的1个中间版本）
第1行： 第1行：
 
== 简介 ==
 
== 简介 ==
−
The framework for learning in huddles is grounded in an experiential learning framework. Based on the assumptions of experiential learning theories, Quinn et al. (2016) focus on variables that seem particularly relevant to resolving the unique challenges of learning in huddles, and perceived job relevance is one of preconditions for learning in experiential learning theory. Perceived job relevance is the integration of abstract ideas and concrete experience, and they propose that, in huddles, people will be more motivated to integrate abstract ideas with concrete experience when they see huddle topics as relevant to their own jobs.
+
工作相关感知（perceived job relevance）是体验式学习理论学习的先决条件之一。
−
 
+
Quinn et al. (2016)认为工作的相关性是抽象的概念与具体经验的整合，他们提出，在群体中，当人们看到群体主题作为自己的工作有关时，他们会更有动力去整合抽象的理念与具体的经验。
−
Quinn et al. (2016) tested their hypotheses using data obtained from participants in huddles that took place in newspaper newsrooms. Ultimately, we received at least one completed survey from 106 newsrooms (52% of those who agreed to participate and 21% of eligible newsrooms). This response rate (21%) is similar to the participation rates in individual experience sampling studies (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi & LeFevre, 1989). After dropping surveys from newspapers that sent only one completed survey, we had 178 surveys from 73 newspapers (14% of total newsrooms).
 
  
 
== 信度与效度 ==
 
== 信度与效度 ==
−
Cronbach’s alpha for relevance was 0.90 in their exploratory dataset and 0.75 in the final dataset.
+
工作相关感知量表内部一致性系数为0.75。
  
 
== 量表 ==
 
== 量表 ==
 
请您根据自己的实际感受和体会，用下面3项描述对您的工作情况进进行评价和判断，并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下：
 
请您根据自己的实际感受和体会，用下面3项描述对您的工作情况进进行评价和判断，并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下：
−
1 = “disagree completely” to 9 = “agree completely.”
+
1 = “非常同意” 到 9 = “非常不同意”
  
 
1.The issues we discussed in this meeting were personally relevant given what I do in the newsroom.<br>
 
1.The issues we discussed in this meeting were personally relevant given what I do in the newsroom.<br>
 
2.The things we talked about in this meeting relate to my job.<br>
 
2.The things we talked about in this meeting relate to my job.<br>
 
3.The issues addressed in this meeting really aren’t relevant for me or my job.<br>
 
3.The issues addressed in this meeting really aren’t relevant for me or my job.<br>
−
 
  
 
下载WORD版问卷：[[文件:Pjr.doc]]
 
下载WORD版问卷：[[文件:Pjr.doc]]
第23行： 第21行：
 
== 量表出处 ==
 
== 量表出处 ==
 
Quinn, R. W. (2013). Could we huddle on this project? participant learning in newsroom conversations. Journal of Management, 42(2), Feb 2016, 386-418.
 
Quinn, R. W. (2013). Could we huddle on this project? participant learning in newsroom conversations. Journal of Management, 42(2), Feb 2016, 386-418.
 +
 +
== 友情提醒 ==
 +
为方便学术研究，根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成，供学者在学术研究中使用， <b><font color="red">商业使用请与原作者联系</font></b>。为了尊重作者的劳动成果， <b><font color="blue">请根据量表出处规范引用</font></b>，谢谢！
  
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]
 
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]

2016年12月24日 (六) 14:26的最新版本

简介

工作相关感知（perceived job relevance）是体验式学习理论学习的先决条件之一。 Quinn et al. (2016)认为工作的相关性是抽象的概念与具体经验的整合，他们提出，在群体中，当人们看到群体主题作为自己的工作有关时，他们会更有动力去整合抽象的理念与具体的经验。

信度与效度

工作相关感知量表内部一致性系数为0.75。

量表

请您根据自己的实际感受和体会，用下面3项描述对您的工作情况进进行评价和判断，并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下： 1 = “非常同意” 到 9 = “非常不同意”

1.The issues we discussed in this meeting were personally relevant given what I do in the newsroom.
2.The things we talked about in this meeting relate to my job.
3.The issues addressed in this meeting really aren’t relevant for me or my job.

下载WORD版问卷：文件:Pjr.doc

计分方法

工作相关感知量表总共3道题，可计算平均分或总分。

量表出处

Quinn, R. W. (2013). Could we huddle on this project? participant learning in newsroom conversations. Journal of Management, 42(2), Feb 2016, 386-418.

友情提醒

为方便学术研究，根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成，供学者在学术研究中使用， 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果， 请根据量表出处规范引用，谢谢！

取自“http://www.obhrm.net/index.php?title=Perceived_Job_Relevance_Scale_工作相关感知量表&oldid=1716”