“Volunteering Credits and Stigmas Scale 志愿信任与瑕疵量表”的版本间的差异
(→计分方法) |
|||
第54行: | 第54行: | ||
==参考文献== | ==参考文献== | ||
Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159. | Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 友情提醒 == | ||
+ | 为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, <b><font color="red">商业使用请与原作者联系</font></b>。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, <b><font color="blue">请根据量表出处规范引用</font></b>,谢谢! | ||
[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]] | [[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]] |
2016年12月24日 (六) 15:04的最新版本
简介
员工志愿工作(employee volunteering)是指当员工在一些计划活动的过程中,他们花费一定时间给一个志愿者团队(Clary & Snyder,1999)。比如在企业志愿者日,一个雇员花时间在一个当地的厨房做志愿服务,或参加一项例如“人类的栖息地”的倡议活动。
Jessica B. Rodell(2016)等人开发了一个量表工具,可以从同事的志愿服务中取得一个更具体的声誉评价,并从中确定积极和消极的构成要素。
信度与效度
Jessica B. Rodell(2016)等人通过对120份由管理者完成的问卷和140份由被评价人同事完成的问卷进行研究,测量模型显示了足够适合的数据:χ2=(df=194)=377.76,CFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.060,SRMR=0.046。志愿信任量表的内部一致性系数为0.84,志愿瑕疵量表的内部一致性系数为0.83。
量表
请您根据自己的实际感受和体会,对下面32项有关您的同事/下属的描述进行评价和判断,并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下:1 非常不同意 2 不同意 3 不好确定 4同意 5 非常同意
1.He/she effectively manages his/her time.
2.He/she organizes his/her schedule in an efficient manner.
3.He/she allocates his/her time well.
4.He/she is good at budgeting his/her time in order to get things done.
5.He/she displays concern for others.
6.He/she genuinely cares about others.
7.He/she is generous to others.
8.He/she is kind to others.
9.He/she feels a sense of responsibility toward the community.
10.He/she is committed to the community.
11.He/she is an active part of the community.
12.He/she feels a sense of duty to the community.
13.He/she has a strong moral compass.
14.He/she has good ethical values.
15.He/she conducts his/her life in an ethical manner.
16.He/she always tries to do the right thing.
17.He/she is often distracted from other things he/she should focus on.
18.He/she doesn’t keep his/her “eye on the prize.”
19.His/her attention is diverted from other activities.
20.He/she seems to focus on the wrong things.
21.He/she pressures others to get involved in the community.
22.He/she pushes others to take part in community events.
23.He/she petitions people to be active in community efforts.
24.He/she solicits others’ involvement in the community.
25.He/she is trying to fill a void in his/her life.
26.He/she is looking for something that is currently missing in his/her life.
27.He/she is compensating for a sense of emptiness in his/her life.
28.He/she is seeking to make up for a gap in his/her life.
29.He/she believes that he/she is better than others.
30.He/she views himself/herself as superior to others.
31.He/she thinks he/she is more important than other people.
32.He/she presumes that others are not as good as he/she is.
下载WORD版问卷:文件:VCS.doc
计分方法
志愿信任与瑕疵量表包括志愿信任量表和志愿瑕疵量表两部分,可以分别计算各自量表所包括题目的总分或平均分,每部分及分量表包括的题目如下:
志愿信任:时间管理(1-4题),其他焦点(5-8题),团队意识(9-12题),伦理价值(13-16题)。
志愿瑕疵: 注意力分散(17-20题),强迫他们参与团队(21-24题),填补他们生活中的空虚(25-28题),自以为是(29-32题)。
量表出处
Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. W. (2015). Perceptions of employee volunteering: is it "credited" or "stigmatized" by colleagues?. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 611-635.
参考文献
Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159.
友情提醒
为方便学术研究,根据公开发表的学术成果整理而成,供学者在学术研究中使用, 商业使用请与原作者联系。为了尊重作者的劳动成果, 请根据量表出处规范引用,谢谢!