查看“Perceived Job Relevance Scale 工作相关感知量表”的源代码

== 简介 ==
The framework for learning in huddles is grounded in an experiential learning framework. Based on the assumptions of experiential learning theories, Quinn et al. (2016) focus on variables that seem particularly relevant to resolving the unique challenges of learning in huddles, and perceived job relevance is one of preconditions for learning in experiential learning theory. Perceived job relevance is the integration of abstract ideas and concrete experience, and they propose that, in huddles, people will be more motivated to integrate abstract ideas with concrete experience when they see huddle topics as relevant to their own jobs.

Quinn et al. (2016) tested their hypotheses using data obtained from participants in huddles that took place in newspaper newsrooms. Ultimately, we received at least one completed survey from 106 newsrooms (52% of those who agreed to participate and 21% of eligible newsrooms). This response rate (21%) is similar to the participation rates in individual experience sampling studies (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi & LeFevre, 1989). After dropping surveys from newspapers that sent only one completed survey, we had 178 surveys from 73 newspapers (14% of total newsrooms).

== 信度与效度 ==
Cronbach’s alpha for relevance was 0.90 in their exploratory dataset and 0.75 in the final dataset.

== 量表 ==
请您根据自己的实际感受和体会，用下面3项描述对您的工作情况进进行评价和判断，并在最符合的数字上划○。评价和判断的标准如下：
1 = “disagree completely” to 9 = “agree completely.”

1.The issues we discussed in this meeting were personally relevant given what I do in the newsroom.<br>
2.The things we talked about in this meeting relate to my job.<br>
3.The issues addressed in this meeting really aren’t relevant for me or my job.<br>


下载WORD版问卷：[[文件:Pjr.doc]]

== 计分方法 ==
工作相关感知量表总共3道题，可计算平均分或总分。

== 量表出处 ==
Quinn, R. W. (2013). Could we huddle on this project? participant learning in newsroom conversations. Journal of Management, 42(2), Feb 2016, 386-418.

[[category: 研究量表]][[category: 英文量表]]